I've decided that for the most part you have to do what your employee asked, and as we said in class, Utah is an at-will employment state. I think this problem goes back to the psychological contract. An employee needs to have good understanding of what their employer expects, and the employer should realize that the employee will only do what is asked to a certain point without extra motivation. If there is a good psychological contract and both sides keep up their end of the deal, then I would say the number of problems that arise will be very limited.

Chapter 4 deals with job design and work flow. What I have always thought interesting is job description. Many times employers ask their employees to do things that are not included in their job descriptions. As a result, most employers write something like "other tasks as assigned" into their job descriptions. Is there a limit to what an employer can say is under the "other tasks" category? Should an employee always do what is asked, even when it may be a very extreme interpretation of "other tasks"?

Most employers will only provide information like the dates of employment, what pay was received, and what positions the person held in the company.

In class we discussed this and decided that it is a very difficult situation, but then we also decided that if we were ever dismissed from a company for bad behavior, we probably wouldn't be asking that company for a reference letter anyway. We would be more likely to ask a previous employer that would be able to write positive things in the letter.

I read an article called Employee References: Is Passing Off Your Bad Apples to Someone else OK?
Below is a link to the article.
It was a very interesting article that poses a good question: What can a former employer say in a reference letter when the employment may not have been terminated on the best of terms? There are laws that protect employees from slander, and from a reference letter being written that casts a negative light on the prospective employee.

What can an employer do to limit the problems they may have as a result of the letter? (The article has a few answers that will be discussed in the not so distant future right here on my blog)

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=47111849&site=ehost-live

In class we discussed the different reasons what a person may find it difficult to report a problem that he or she is seeing. We mostly figured that it is so hard because even though there are laws that should prevent it, there is almost always some form of retaliation when a problem is reported and the person making the problem gets in trouble. We didn't come to a conclusion 0n a good solution to this, other than keeping the employee who reported the problem confidential, even though that can only happen to a certain extent.
It is a tough situation, and I figure that's why there are laws that try to protect us all from it.

EEOC

Chapter 3 discusses many of the problems and solutions to equal opportunity in employment. In my experience, I have had both good and bad examples of how managers can model their hiring and firing practices. Even with so many laws that are in place to prevent unfair hiring, firing, and treatment of employees, there are so many unfair situations. It is a very delicate situation and if taken care of wrong, there can be severe consequences.

What can a person do to avoid these problems and consequences?

When a person is facing situations that relate to bad hiring, firing, or treatment practices, what can he or she do to fix the situation?

In discussion today we talked about how much a manager's or owner's attitude can change the mood and morale, and even the success of the company as a whole. In our group we talked about the the different bosses we have had and how it was to work for them. Many times a bad boss can cause such a high turnover rate that there is no way to train employees fast enough to keep up with work demand, and therefore the company can cease to exist. Also we discussed the movie clip we saw and how positive the experience can be when the boss is good and fun and there is good communication. When both sides of the psychological contract fulfill their responsibilities, a very bad job can turn into something that anyone would be willing to do.